User avatar
nicole 🔜 XVI P.I.W.O. @mkljczk@twojstary.gay
1mo
twitter, "ai", supertuxkart, wtf why is SuperTuxKart "verified" twitter account shilling grapheneos in response to a post about running vibe-ported postmarketos on pixel 6, this is wrong on so many levels
😥1
1
1
4
1

User avatar
stilic neocat_flag_demiguy neocat_flag_pan @stilic@kitty.tel
1mo
twitter, "ai", supertuxkart, wtf @mkljczk hopefully it's not an official account
BTW what's the link to said post?
1
0
1
0
User avatar
nicole 🔜 XVI P.I.W.O. @mkljczk@twojstary.gay
1mo
RE: twitter, "ai", supertuxkart, wtf @stilic x.com/supertuxkart/status/2110109063648583696
1
0
1
0
User avatar
stilic neocat_flag_demiguy neocat_flag_pan @stilic@kitty.tel
1mo
RE: twitter, "ai", supertuxkart, wtf @mkljczk seems like to me they're just suggesting something to a random account
I wouldn't take it too seriously
1
0
0
0
User avatar
nicole 🔜 XVI P.I.W.O. @mkljczk@twojstary.gay
1mo
RE: twitter, "ai", supertuxkart, wtf @stilic The Twitter profile of a popular FOSS game suggests to an account called "smartphones without Google" to use a soft-fork of Google' OS that's just about to end support for Pixel 6. It's like asking someone recommending STK specifically as a FOSS game why won't they just play Mario Kart. Why did the game profile post it? Why pay for Twitter?



On the other side, relying on Anthropic' services to create a low-quality port that somehow happens to partially work creates similar issues to soft-forking Android (at least it might help solving the chicken and egg problem for mobile Linux). Hence it's not just STK' reply that's so wrong.
0
0
3
0